检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:缪海雄[1] 孙春汉[1] 陆炳刚[1] 彭建国 徐少宏[3]
机构地区:[1]广东省惠州市第一人民医院骨科,惠州516000 [2]深圳市第四人民医院,深圳518033 [3]广东省惠州市中心人民医院,惠州516001
出 处:《航空航天医学杂志》2011年第6期663-664,共2页Journal of Aerospace medicine
摘 要:目的:比较单侧椎板切除和保守治疗对中度单侧腿疼的单侧腰椎管侧隐窝狭窄症患者的治疗效果,探讨单侧椎板切除在治疗单侧腰椎管侧隐窝狭窄症中的临床应用价值。方法:对28例中度单侧腿疼的单侧腰椎管侧隐窝狭窄症患者随机分为两组,一组采用单椎板切除减压手术治疗,另外一组行保守治疗,分别在术后6个月、12个月、24个月对患者的腰痛、下肢放射痛、行走耐受性和功能恢复进行评价。结果:术后各期随访单椎板切除减压手术治疗组有效率均高于保守治疗组(P<0.01),经统计学处理,两组之间有显著差异。结论:单侧椎板切除减压治疗单侧腰椎管侧隐窝狭窄症的减压效果是显著,并且术后的长期效果满意,并可避免因为全椎板切除而产生的并发症,可以作为治疗单侧腰椎管侧隐窝狭窄症的标准手术,在临床上推广。Objective:To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for unilateral lumbal lateral recess stenosis patients,and to explore the clinical value of unilateral lumbal lateral recess stenosis in patients with unilateral laminectomy.Methods:28 cases of unilateral lumbal lateral recess stenosis were divided into two groups,one group treated with unilateral laminectomy,and the other group treated with conservative therapy.The patients were evaluated by back pain,leg pain,walking tolerance and neurological during follow-up.Results:The unilateral laminectomy group produced a higher rate of improvement than the conservative therapy group during follow-up.There were significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions:Conclusion: Unilateral lubal lateral recess stenosis can be decompressed adequately by unilateral laminectomy,which obtained satisfactory long-term outcomes with few complications and low cost,can be a standard procedure for the surgical treatment of the unilateral lubal lateral recess stenosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185