检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:菅从进[1]
出 处:《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第4期116-122,共7页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:立足于特定的法律理念,凯尔森构建了内容驳杂而独特的法律规范理论。其静态的法律规范理论,认定真正的法律规范由不法行为和制裁构成,将义务和权利视作次要的法律技术。其动态的法律规范理论,构造了法律规范的体系性存在和"有效之链"。但特定的法律理念,使凯尔森只能坚持静态法律规范的优先性,将动态法律规范定位于说明前者的辅助地位,以追求所谓的两者内在统一。这种法律规范理论,从基础理念到逻辑论证,都存在一定的局限性。Based in the specific legal idea,Kelsen has constructed the legal norm theory whose content is heterogeneous and unique.Its static legal norms theory recognizes that the true legal norm is constituted by the delict and the sanction and the duty and right as the secondary legal technology.Its dynamic legal norm theory has constructed the legal norm systematic existence and "the chain of validity".But the specific legal idea enables Kelsen only to insist the priority of static legal norm and to locate the dynamic legal norm in the auxiliary status in order to show the former,so as to pursue the so-called both's intrinsic unification.From the foundational idea to the logical proof,this kind of legal norm theory has some limitations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222