“石头悖论”探析——兼论宗教哲学的逻辑分析进路  

An Inquiry into the Paradox of the Stone

作　　者：张力锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院公安管理系,江苏南京210012

出　　处：《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第4期126-130,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2008年度国家社科基金项目"不完全信息博弈论的归纳概率逻辑基础"(08BZX048)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要："石头悖论"是无神论者反击一神论的一个重要论证,不但是宗教哲学研究的热点问题,而且具有重要的逻辑研究价值。玛弗罗迪斯式逻辑分析存在重大缺陷,未能准确地揭示"石头悖论"的逻辑结构。借鉴萨维奇有关"石头悖论"的认识,"石头悖论"的真实逻辑结构得以显示,也进而得以顺利破解。通过"石头悖论"这一宗教哲学研究的典型案例,逻辑分析作为宗教哲学一条重要进路的地位得以自然彰显,逻辑分析进路影响到语言范式的转变和推理、论证规则的选取。The paradox of the stone is an important argument used by atheists to criticize monotheism.It is not only a hot spot for the philosophy of religion but also has great value of logic.The Mavrodesian logical analysis has some significant faults and does not reveal the real logical structure of the paradox.With the help of the thought of Savage on the paradox,the logical structure of the paradox is shown and hence the stone paradox gets solved.Through the typical discussing case of the paradox of the stone in the philosophy of religion,the important status of the approach of logical analysis to the philosophy of religion naturally emerges.The approach of logical analysis determines the change of the paradigm of language and the selection of the rules of argumentation and reasoning.

关 键 词：石头悖论 全能 逻辑结构 逻辑分析 否定词的辖域 

分 类 号：B81-05[哲学宗教—逻辑学]