检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:芦芳[1] 周敏新[1] 张爱萍[1] 吕少诚[1] 张金颖[1] 朱焕改[1] 史宪杰[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院肝胆外科五病区,北京100853
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2011年第14期2914-2915,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的探讨腹部手术后患者咳痰方法的改进。方法选择行腹部手术患者63例,采用自身对照的方法,护士分别使用常规方法与改进后方法协助患者进行咳痰,比较两种方法的成功率及对患者舒适度的影响。结果使用改进后的方法协助患者咳痰的有效率为87.3%,明显高于常规方法(33.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),改进后的方法舒适度显著优于常规方法(P<0.05)。结论对腹部手术患者采用改进后方法协助咳痰,能够明显提高咳痰的成功率、减轻患者的不适。OBJECTIVE To explore the improved methods of expectoration after abdominal surgery. METHODS The clinical data of expectoration after abdominal surgery on 63 cases were analyzed. The patients coughed up phlegm with the help of conventional methods and improved methods by nurse,the success rate and the comfort of the two methods were compared. RESULTS The success rate and the comfort of the improved methods of expectoration were higher than the conventional methods, and there were statistical significance difference between the two methods (P〈0.05). CONCLUSION The use of the improved methods of expectoration can obviously and effectively improve the success rate of expectoration, and reduce the discomfort of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28