人权视角下的被告人刑事陪审选择权  

The Right to Selecting Jury System in Criminal Procedure from the Perspective of Human Rights

作　　者：谢安平[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学法学院 [2]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2011年第4期65-69,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：陪审制度的存在有三个不同层次的根据:被告人享有由自己的同类来审判自己的权利;通过审判公开、辩护、正当法律程序保障被告人人权;能够将民众的感情、感受及对犯罪的认识带入审判中,使审判活动与社会生活保持协调一致,保证审判独立。我国陪审制度需进一步完善:明确规定侵犯被告人陪审选择权的否定性法律后果;建立对陪审员的无因回避制度;实行陪审员随机遴选机制;缩小陪审案件的范围并规定公民的陪审义务。The existence of the jury system is based on three grounds of different levels., the accused has the right to be judged by his kindred; through public trial, defense and proper legal procedures, the defendants＇ rights are protected; public sentiments and criminal understanding can be brought into the trial process; the trial and social public life can be made harmonious, guaranteeing an independent trial. This paper provides some suggestions on improving Chinese jury system： the negative consequence of infringing upon the right to selecting jury system should be provided for by the criminal procedural law; the peremptory challenge system to jurors should be established; the jurors should be selected at random; the range of cases which are tried by the tribunal composed of the jurors and judges should be reduced.

关 键 词：陪审制度 陪审选择权 陪审义务 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]