检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗秀玲[1] 龚小英[1] 丁金荣[1] 曾科思[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市龙岗区人民医院消毒供应室,518172
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2011年第14期134-135,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:探讨不同清洗方法对医疗器械清洗效果。方法:通过采用四种清洗方法,比较器械在不同时间的潜血阳性数;采用多酶清洗法与传统清洗法,比较两者处理后器械洁净合格率;采用机器清洗与手工清洗法,比较器械的蛋白质与残留血。结果:多酶机清洗法,与多酶浸泡清洗法、清水清洗法的差异P<0.01,而与冲洗配合酶泡清洗法的差异P>0.05;多酶清洗法与传统清洗法处理后器械洁净合格率差异P<0.01;机器清洗与手工清洗后器械蛋白质残留比较差异P<0.05。结论:不同清洗方法对医疗器械的清洗效果有明显不同。Objective: To learn the effects on the medical instrumentations by using different methods of washing.Methods: To compare the positive rate of occult blood after using four diverse methods in different time.The percents of pass about cleanliness are compared after using the multienzyme method and traditional method.The residual protein and blood are compared after using the machine and artificial methods.Results: The method of multienzyme machine is different from the method of multienzyme and water,whose P0.01,but is similar with the method of flushing and enzyme soaking,whose P0.05.The different of methods of multienzyme and tradition was P0.01.And the different of machine and artificial methods was P0.05.Conclusion: Each method of washing has obvious diverse effects on medical instrumentations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117