检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长春理工大学法学院,吉林长春130022 [2]沈阳大学政法学院,辽宁沈阳110044
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第4期133-137,共5页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:本文通过对票据抗辩权的法理基础进行剖析,揭示了票据抗辩权存在的应然性与合理性。首先,票据抗辩权乃公平原则之体现,通过赋予票据债务人票据抗辩权以实现票据当事人的地位平等保护,从而实现票据当事人的利益平衡;其次,票据抗辩权乃正义对安全校正之载体;复次,票据抗辩权乃票据流通与交易安全平衡之手段;最后,票据抗辩权实现了票据的经济效益,票据抗辩权的设置对票据这种资源的配置更有效率,实现了法的经济价值——效益。This paper's exploration into defense right upon the negotiable instrument,from the perspective of the jurisprudential basis,fully demonstrates the necessity and rationality of defense right upon the negotiable instrument.First of all,defense right upon the negotiable instrument embodies the principle of fairness,since endowing defense right upon the negotiable instrument to debtors may protect the right of debtors so as to keep the profit balance among the parties concerned.Secondly,defense right upon the negotiable instrument is the carrier of justice which may help secure correction.Furthermore,defense right upon the negotiable instrument is the safe and balanced means of negotiation and transaction.Last but not the least,defense right upon the negotiable instrument realizes the economic benefits of the negotiable instrument.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7