论基本权利效力的理论构造——基于德、法两国的比较研究  

Comparison of Fundamental Rights Validity Theory between Germany and France

作　　者：刘建军[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西贺州学院,广西贺州542800

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2011年第4期3-6,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

基　　金：广西研究生教育创新计划项目"基本权利司法救济制度创新研究"(2008106020301M283)

摘　　要：在德、法两国,基本权利被认为具有"主观权利"与"客观法"的双重性质,都以自然法和自然权利作为其理论基础,并具有宪法性规范的地位;在对基本权利限制之限制的理论认识上,两国均以公共利益的法律化、具体化、明确化为目标。德、法两国的经验为我国建构基本权利效力理论体系提供了重要启示。Fundamental rights are considered to characterize both subjective rights and objective laws in Germany and France. They take natural laws and natural rights as their theoretical base and have their constitutional regulatory place. Both Germany and France take legalization, concretization and clarification of public interest as their goal on the theory of fundamental rights limitation. All of these provide important enlightenment to build the theory of fundamental right validity in China.

关 键 词：基本权利 自然权利 宪法效力 权利限制 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]