检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岭南急诊医学杂志》2011年第3期198-199,共2页Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
基 金:广东省东莞市科研基金项目(4401120060975K)
摘 要:目的:探讨硬外穿刺困难应急预案的可行性和有效性。方法:拟在椎管内麻醉下进行手术,ASA I-Ⅱ级,硬外穿刺困难106例,年龄20-70岁,随机分为对照组(n=54)和实验组(n=52)。比较两组穿刺成功率、所用的时间、术后腰背部不适和并发症等。结果:实验组硬外穿刺成功率明显高于对照组,试验组所用的时间、术后腰背部不适均明显少于对照组,P均<0.05。结论:硬外穿刺困难应急预案在基层医院安全有效可行。Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of emergency plan for epidural punctures difficulty. Methods: 106 cases ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ operated under intrathecal anesthesia with epidural puncture difficulty aged 20-70 years were divided randomly into the control group (group A, n=54) and experiment group (n=52). The success rate, time used and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The success rate of epidural puncture in the experiment group was significantly higher than that in the control group, but the time used and complications in the experiment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, all P〈0.05. Conclusion: Emergency plan for epidural punctures difficulty is safe, effective and feasible in grass-roots hospital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74