检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省自贡市第一人民医院
出 处:《全科护理》2011年第20期1789-1790,共2页Chinese General Practice Nursing
摘 要:[目的]观察机械通气病人振动排痰的效果。[方法]将60例机械通气病人随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用振动排痰法,对照组采用手工叩击排痰法,1周后比较两组病人呼吸、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、氧分压(PaO2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)及住重症监护室(ICU)时间。[结果]两组病人在R、SaO2、PaO2、PaCO2以及住ICU时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]振动排痰用于机械通气病人明显优于手工叩击排痰。Objective:To observe the effect of vibration expectoration for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.Methods:A total of 60 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,and patients of experimental group were treated with vibration expectoration,while the control group patients used hand percussion expectoration.Then to compare the respiratory(R),arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2),partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2),partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),and time in ICU between two groups one week later.Results:There were statistical significant differences between the two groups in the R,SaO2,PaO2,PaCO2,and time in ICU(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Vibration expectoration is significantly better than hand percussion expectoration applied for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.99.99