检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田焕书[1] 柳建军[1] 吴宏[1] 吴舟[1] 桂志明[1]
出 处:《医学信息(下旬刊)》2011年第7期92-93,共2页Medical information
摘 要:目的:比较经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术和经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效。方法:将60例良性前列腺增生的患者随机分为两组:分别行经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术30例,和经尿道前列腺等离子电切术30例,对两组手术治疗的效果进行评价和比较。结果;TUEP组术中各项指标均较PKRP组好,两组比较差异有显著意义(P〈0.05)。结论:PKEP治疗前列腺增生具更好的有效性和安全性,值得临床推广使用。Objective To compare the curative effect of TUEP and PKRP on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Method 60 cases of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were divided into two groups: In TUEP group, 30 patients were treated by TUEP; in PKRP group, 30 patients were treated by PKRP. The effect of the two groups were evaluated and compared. Results All the indicatrixs in TUEP group Were better than the PKRP group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Comparing to PKRP, the treatment of TUEP, has a better effectivity and security and is worth for generalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3