检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京100081 [2]中国科学院脊椎动物进化系统学重点实验室,北京100044
出 处:《解剖学报》2011年第4期558-561,共4页Acta Anatomica Sinica
基 金:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项基金资助项目(XDA05130102);中国科学院脊椎动物进化系统学重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目(2011LESV010);科技部国际合作重点资助项目(2009DFB20580);中央民族大学自主科研计划资助项目(1112KYQN12)
摘 要:目的探讨青铜铁器时代新疆、内蒙古地区人群下颌骨第一磨牙(M1)的磨耗特点。方法根据磨耗程度进行分级,将新疆(77例)、内蒙古(123例)地区的牙齿磨耗进行比较,并同时对比近代人群(云南、华北共134例),用SPSS13.0软件对磨耗级别分数进行均值计算和各组间差异的显著性检验。结果青铜铁器时代的新疆、内蒙古人群牙齿磨耗度都大于近代人群,提示当时食物可能较近代人坚硬。新疆的牙齿磨耗度大于内蒙古地区,可能反映了食物结构、经济方式的差异。新疆人群牙齿磨耗度左右侧相似,性别差异显著,内蒙古人群牙齿磨耗也是左右侧相似、性别差异显著,提示这可能是青铜铁器时代牙齿磨耗的共性,但还需更多遗址标本来检验。结论青铜铁器时代的牙齿磨耗大于近代,新疆、内蒙古人群牙齿磨耗存在差异。Objective To aware tooth wear of mandibular first molar ( M, ) in Bronze-Iron Ages from Xinjiang amt Inner Mongolia. Methods Tooth wear of M1 from Xinjiang ( n = 77) and Inner Mongolia ( n = 123) human mandibles was recorded, and then comparisons were made among groups using SPSS 13.0 software. Results Tooth wear of Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia people was more obvious than modern hmnan, which might indicate that food in Bronzc-lron ages was much rougher. Tooth wear in Xinjiang was more obvious than that in Inner Mongolia. The tooth wear from Xinjiang and hmcr Mongolia had some common traits: there was no big difference in M1 tooth wear between left and right sides, and male' s tooth wear was more obvious than female. Conclusion Tooth wear in Xinjiang is more obvious than in Inner Mongolia, and the difference may be related to food, economic types, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127