中国城市绿化评价系统比较分析  

Comparison and Analysis of Evaluation System of Urban Greening in China

作　　者：杨静怡[1] 杨军[1] 马履一[1] 贾忠奎[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京100083

出　　处：《城市环境与城市生态》2011年第4期13-16,共4页Urban Environment & Urban Ecology

基　　金：北京市科技计划"北京宜居城市绿化体系建设关键技术研究与示范"项目(Z00060660000701);北京市教学委员会学科建设与研究生教育建设项目"北京市生态公益林质量升级关键技术研究"产学研联合培养研究生基地(CXYBL2008-2010)资助

摘　　要：城市绿化在城市环境建设中起着至关重要的作用。为衡量城市绿化建设的水平和指导城市规划,有必要建立科学的绿化评价体系。分析和比较了中国现有的4种国家级城市绿化评价体系:国家园林城市标准、全国绿化模范城市标准、国家森林城市标准和国家生态园林城市标准,并从易得性、可比性、简易性、客观性等4个方面对具体的指标进行了分析。4种绿化评价体系除基本符合易得性原则外,在可比性、简易性和客观性等方面均存在不足。作为对全国城市绿化具有导向性的国家级绿化评价体系,在指标中应考虑增加公众评价意见,并适度增加相对性指标,加大定量指标的比例和利用数学方法合理确定指标的权重。Urban greening can help to improve environments of cities. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of urban greening efforts and guide the planning process, an evaluation system needs to be created. In this study four different evaluation systems at the national level currently used in China were compared. The criteria for designating national garden city, national green model city, national forest city, and national ecological garden city were analyzed for their accessibility, comparability, simplicity and objectivity. Except for meeting the criterion of accessibility, the other three evaluation systems did not meet their criteria in certain degrees. So public opinions should be reflected in the evaluation system. Relative indicators should be added and more quantitative indexes should be used. All indicators should be weighted by using standard mathematical method.

关 键 词：城市绿化 评价指标 评价原则 指标权重 

分 类 号：S73[农业科学—林学]