要物合同的正当性论证之非本体论的视角  

The Justification of Real Contract:an Unontological Perspective

作　　者：蒋军洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《改革与战略》2011年第7期37-40,共4页Reformation & Strategy

基　　金：河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目<合意主义体系下的要物合同制度研究>(项目编号:2009BS024)的研究成果

摘　　要：文章认为,除去其自身概念的合理性,要物合同制度自被罗马法确立以来被保留至今还有三大方面的理由:一是法律传统使然;二是立法者乐意采用此制度设计还旨在以此等法律规范为当事人的意愿解释提供一种通常的判断,以反映社会实践层面的法律需求;三是因其无偿性,传统要物合同欠缺当事人产生此债的客观意义上的原因,要物合同法律规范所要求的交付则补足了当事人单纯合意的原因欠缺。为此,文章建议保留无偿的传统要物合同,将有偿要物合同予以诺成化改造。Besides the rationality of the concept of real contract,such system which has been reservered from its emergence from Roman law has three reasons： firstly,it has been reservered because of the legal tradition;secondly,the lawmakers like to adopt such system because these regulations can provide the usual judgment of the intention of the contracting parties,and reflect the needs of social practice;thirdly,because of its gratuitous nature,the traditional real contract lack the objective reason of the contracting parties to contract this obligation,the regulation of real contract can make up for the deficiency.Accordingly,it is suggested that the gratuitous traditional real contract to be reservered and the onerous real contract to be transformed into consensual contract.

关 键 词：要物合同 法律传统 法律目的 法律伦理 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]