操作思维的项目差异及类属理论建构  

Events Differences of Operational Thinking and Construction of Its Classification Theory

作　　者：刘改成[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州医学院体育教研室,广东广州510182

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2011年第4期290-296,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

摘　　要：为考察不同运动项目操作思维的类属差异,以新研发的《BTL-SW-V1.2操作思维测试软件》对来自不同项群共10个项目的304名高水平运动员进行测试。研究显示,所测10个运动项目,具有显著操作思维类属差异。根据操作思维能力的高低,构建运动项目的操作思维类属理论,其中,乒乓球、羽毛球、曲棍球和跆拳道为一类,称之为高操作思维类;赛艇、游泳、体操、武术(套路)、射击(步枪)和举重为一类,称之为低操作思维类,前一类显著优于后一类,即操作步数少、操作反应快且操作思维学习能力强。The operational thinking testing software of BTL-SW -V1.2, newly-published, was used as the research tool. The categorical differences of operational thinking between sport events were examined. 304 elite athletes from 10 sports events were chosen as subjects. The main conclusion revealed the categorical differences of operational thinking between the sport events were significant. According to the abilities of operational thinking, 10 sports events could be divided into two categories： one was called High Operational Thinking Strategy Event-group, including field hockey, table tennis, badminton and taekwondo; the other one was called Low Operational Thinking Strategy Event-group, including rowing, swimming, gymnastics, wushu （taolu）,shooting （rifle） and weight-lifting. In which the former was better than the latter, that is to say, less steps, faster reaction time and higher learning ability.

关 键 词：操作思维 项目差异 操作思维Vincent学习曲线 操作思维学习递进系数 

分 类 号：G804.8[文化科学—运动人体科学]