刚性维权与动态维稳——“权利本位说”在维稳时代所遭遇的挑战  

Maintaining Dynamic Stability and Maintaining Right Rigidly

作　　者：吕明[1] 

机构地区：[1]合肥师范学院政法与管理系,安徽合肥230061

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2011年第4期3-10,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:"解决人民内部矛盾的基本制度保证和具体制度建设"(项目编号:08BKS035);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目:"法的意识形态功能研究--以‘维稳’为视角"(项目编号:AHSK09-10D142)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：上世纪90年代,在"对抗正义观"的笼罩和驱动下,作为中国法学研究的主流理论,"权利本位说"实际促成了法律实践中的刚性维权机制。然而,刚性维权机制无法有效面对"维护社会安定团结"的要求。本世纪以来,建立在"动态维稳"话语之上的法律实践逐渐替代刚性维权机制,"调解"的复兴与"能动司法"的提出展现了这一趋势。在社会现实面前,"权利本位说"必须进行重构。In the 1990s,affected by the concept of ＂justice from antagonism＂,as the mainstream theory of the Chinese legal research,＂standard of right＂ helped to bring about the mechanism of ＂maintaining right rigidly＂ in legal practice.However,the mechanism of ＂maintaining rigid right＂ can not effectively meeting the requirements of ＂maintaining social stability and unity＂.In this century,the legal practice based on ＂maintaining right rigidly＂ discourse has been gradually replacing the mechanism of ＂maintaining rigid right＂,the trend of which may be shown by the revival of ＂mediation＂ and the advocate of ＂dynamic justice＂.In the face of social reality,the viewpoint of ＂standard of right＂ is to be reconstructed.

关 键 词：权利本位说 对抗正义 刚性维权 动态维稳 

分 类 号：D412.6[政治法律—政治学]