《白马论》真伪考述评  

A Review of Scrutinizing the Authenticity of Baima Lun

作　　者：何杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所,广州510275

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2011年第7期78-84,共7页Library Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"基于广义论证的先秦逻辑研究"(10JJD720009)

摘　　要：因《汉书.艺文志》名家载《公孙龙子》,而《隋书.经籍志》未载,故清人姚际恒疑其伪书,进而《公孙龙子》中的《白马论》亦成伪书。自此之后,学界多有争论。黄云眉提出进一步论据支持姚说,然而更多的学者论证《白马论》为真书。本文评述了双方所给出的主要论据,并指出现有之论据尚不足以鉴定《白马论》之真伪。Since Gongsun Longzi was recorded in Hanshu Yiwenzhi whereas disappeared in Suishu Jingjizhi,Yao Jiheng,a scholar in Qing Dynasty,rejected it as a pseudograph.Accordingly,Baima Lun becomes a pseudograph either,for it being part of Gongsun Longzi.Thereafter,there have been many disputes on this controversial issue.Although Huang Yunmei tries to support Yao with more arguments,other scholars argue that Baima Lun is authentic.This paper reviews the main arguments of both sides,and then concludes that the evidences we have till now haven＇t sufficed for a judgment on the authenticity of Baima Lun.

关 键 词：《公孙龙子》 《白马论》 真书 伪书 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]