中国古代对“两不和同”的法律规制:以买卖契约为例  

Legal Regulation of the Disagreement in Ancient China:the Case of Sale and Purchase Contract

作　　者：张姗姗[1] 刘彤[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学政法学院,吉林长春130117

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第4期16-20,共5页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：东北师范大学哲学社会科学校内青年基金项目(10QN008);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20100481045)

摘　　要：中国古代契约实践对当事人"和同"意志的强调由来已久。法律对"两不和同"行为也进行了严格规制,禁止买卖契约中的"较固取"、"更出开闭"与"参市"等行为,这体现了对契约当事人自由意愿的尊重,并在很大程度上保障了契约自由。Both parties of contract had put emphasis on the consensus for a long time in the contract practice of ancient China.Meanwhile,the law regulated the act of disagreement severely,prohibited the act such as ＂jiao gu qu＂,＂geng chu kai bi＂ and ＂can shi＂ in the sale and purchase contract.These measures reflect the respect for the free will of the contract parties,and guarantee the realization of freedom of contract to a large extent.

关 键 词：两不和同 法律规制 契约自由 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]