检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊燃[1,2] 龚敏[3] 龚鹏[3] 赵波[3] 贾先巧[3] 曾键年[2] 马振东[3]
机构地区:[1]江西地矿局赣西地质调查队,江西南昌330201 [2]中国地质大学资源学院,湖北武汉430074 [3]中国地质大学地球科学学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《物探与化探》2011年第4期477-482,共6页Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration
基 金:国家"十一五"计划项目(1212010660404)
摘 要:化探找矿正逐步从定性走向定量,在前人研究的基础上,提出了适用于老矿区深部探矿工程少、埋藏较深的矿产资源量估算的计算方法——面金属量积分法和三维地质体块段法。以江西城门山矿区为例,以区内主要含Mo地质体为计算对象,依据各中段面Mo的成晕地球化学信息,结合城门山三维地质—地球化学实体模型,对矿区浅部(第一空间0^-500 m)和深部(第二空间-500^-1 000 m)Mo资源量进行了估算。从计算结果来看,2种方法对浅部资源量估算结果都与已知储量相吻合,深部预测以三维地质体块段法更理想。Geochemical exploration has been gradually transformed from qualification into quantification.Based on previous research results,the authors put forward two methods,i.e.,areal productivity integration and 3D geological blocks,to calculate the resources of concealed ore bodies in old diggings,which are characterized by lack of exploration engineering and deep burial.With the prediction of Mo resources in the Chengmenshan ore deposit as an example and the geological body rich in Mo as the calculation object,and according to the Mo geochemical halo formation in different cross-sections in combination with the characteristics of 3D ore deposit,the authors estimated Mo resources at the shallow part(the first space 0~-500 m) and the depth(the second space-500 m~-1 000 m) of the mining area.The calculation results show that the resources estimated by these two methods at the shallow part are consistent with actual estimations,but the 3D geological blocks method is better in predicting the resources at the depth.
分 类 号:P632[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173