检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]怀集县人民医院,广东怀集526400 [2]深圳市龙岗区南湾人民医院,广东深圳518000
出 处:《现代医院》2011年第8期29-31,共3页Modern Hospitals
摘 要:目的探讨双吻合器技术在低位直肠癌手术中的应用及疗效。方法对2000年1月~2007年1月间低位直肠癌患者中采用双吻合器行保肛术137例(观察组)与同期98例手工缝合行Dixon手术(对照组)的临床资料进行比较。结果应用双吻合器组保肛率明显高于Dixon手术组(p<0.05),手术时间、术后吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄及出血发生率则明显低于Dixon手术组(p<0.05),而两组手术过程中输血量比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),术后3个月时应用双吻合器组患者的控便能力正常比例明显高于Dixon手术组,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05),随访期间,两组局部复发率及1、3、5年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论双吻合器技术应用可提高低位直肠癌的保肛率及生存质量,是一种安全可靠的方法。Objective To study and evaluate the role of double stapling procedure for the anus preserving re- section of low rectal carcinoma. Methods The clinical materials of dixon group (98 cases) and double stapler group ( 137 cases)for the resection of low rectal carcinoma were comparatively analyzed. Results The anus reserving rate of double stapler group is obviously higher than that of dixon group(p 〈 0. 05 ). The operation time, the ration of anasto- motic leakage and anastomotic stenosis of double stapler group was lower than dixon group (p 〈 0. 05 ). There was no statistical difference between these two group of transfusion volume(p 〉 0.05 ). The ratio of normal ability of control-ling stool was higher than dixon group(p 〈 0. 05 ). There was no statistical difference between these two group of the 1.3.5 year survival rate of post - operation (p 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion The double stapling technique can improve the quality of life of patients and the rate of reserving anus, is a safe alternation for anus - saving operation for patients with low rectal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117