检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张胜民[1]
出 处:《特区经济》2011年第7期128-130,共3页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:本文分别从税费理论和各国的社会保障税或费的制度实践对社会保障税费进行比较分析,认为社会保障税并没有严格优于社会保障费。就筹资手段而言,无论名税还是费,其实质都是相似的。在我国,社会保障费改税更多的是一种手段,旨在提高社会统筹层次,提高社保资金的利用效率,更深层的原因是更加突出了政府在社会保障中的责任。社保税的开征将使得政府的责任显性化,但即使改征社保税也仅限于社会统筹资金部分。This article carries on the comparative an alysis to the social security tax and the social security fee,from the tax or fee theory and the national social security system of tax or fee practice,We thought that the social security tax has not surpassed the social security fee strictly.In terms of the financing instruments,name of tax or fee matter,are similar in essence.In China,the social security tax reform is a means of more,aimed at improving the level of social pooling and improve efficiency in the use of social security funds.Deeper reason is more prominent in the government's responsibility in the social security.The introduction of social security taxes will make it the responsibility of the government dominance,but even change levy social security taxes are only part of the social pooling funds.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28