检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长勤[1] 韩传平[1] 高松[1] 孔华[2] 王俊英[1]
机构地区:[1]泰山医学院附属医院,山东省泰安市271000 [2]山东省济南市传染病医院
出 处:《中华医院管理杂志》2011年第8期585-588,共4页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
摘 要:目的探讨各级综合性医院预防控制传染病疫情院内扩散的有效方法。方法选自2009年以来泰安地区一级、二级、三级各2所的6所综合性医院在诊疗传染病过程中,根据患者来院就诊方式、就诊渠道和就诊心理等,对A1、A2、A33个级别的综合性医院实行了传染病五级预检分诊法,对B1、B2、B33个级别的综合性医院仍实施常规预检分诊法。结果对两组3个级别的综合性医院实施不同预检分诊法所造成的传染病漏检病例进行比较,用X^2检验,P值均〈0.005,差异有统计学意义。结论五级预检分诊法能对各级医院将传染病或疑似传染病患者在第一时间内从来院就诊的所有患者中甄别、检查、筛选和截留出来,从而有效预防和控制传染疫情扩散而致医源性感染甚至暴发。Objective To investigate effective methodology for preventing infectious diseases from spreading within general hospitals at all levels. Methods Six hospitals at three levels in the city were made into two groups and investigated for their treatment of infectious diseases. The group of A1, A2 and A3 hospitals employs the five pre-triage, while the group of B2, B2 and B3 employs the routine pre- triage. Results Comparison of undetected infectious cases between group A1, A2, A3 and group B1, B2,B3 identified significant difference with X^2 testing, P〈0. 005. Conclusion Five pre-triage method can screen, identify and pinpoint confirmed or suspected infectious disease patients from all outpatients in the first time, thus preventing and controlling the nosoeomial transmission of epidemic or even an outbreak of nosocomial infection effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.93.117