检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第4期34-42,共9页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
摘 要:中美贸易失衡及其所引发的人民币升值问题是近几年来倍受关注的热点问题。客观来看,贸易总量的失衡并不意味着贸易利益分配的失衡。通过对1978-2007年中美之间的贸易利益分配的分析及估计发现,中美贸易使双方均获得正的总利益。但是,中国居民从中美贸易中获得了产出利益而损失了消费利益,美国居民则刚好相反,并且在美方贸易逆差不断扩大的时期,美国居民的个人总获益要高于其顺差时期。同时,人民币对美元升值将近乎同等幅度地降低双方的贸易利益。因此,对于美国来说,无视中国经济发展的实际情况,一味要求人民币升值对中美双方都是无益,甚至有害。The imbalance of Sino - US trade and the consequent RMB appreciation have received a great deal of atten- tion in recent years. Objectively, trade imbalance does not necessarily lead to imbalanced distribution of trade benefits. By a theoretical analysis and estimation of the distribution of trade benefits between China and the USA from1978 to 2007, we find that the total trade benefits of both countries are positive. However, Chinese people gain the output benefits from Sino - US trade but lose the consumption benefits whereas the reverse is true with American people. Besides, the total benefits per capita in the USA are higher when there is a trade deficit than when there is a trade surplus. It is also estimated that the RMB appreciation against USD win reduce the trade benefits for both countries at the same rate as the appreciation rate. It follows that if the USA forces China to appreciate RMB disregarding the circumstances of China's economic development it will bring harm to itself, not to mention bringing harm to both countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30