检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省宜宾县妇幼保健院,四川宜宾644600 [2]四川省妇幼保健院,成都610031
出 处:《中外医疗》2011年第21期1-1,3,共2页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的观察中西医结合治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法采用随机、双盲和1:1平行对照的试验方法。将60例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例。2组皆用西医常规治疗,其中治疗组在西医常规治疗的基础上加用中药,水煎服,每日1剂,15d为1个疗程。观察喘息症状的变化及肺部哮鸣音的消减情况。结果治疗组喘息症状及肺部哮鸣音的消减总有效率为93.33%(28/30例),对照组总有效率为73.32%(22/30例),2组治愈率与总有效率比较均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效显著优于单纯西医治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。Objective To observe the clinical effect of bronchial asthma treated by traditional chinese combined with western medicine.Methods This clinical trial was randomly double-blind and parallel controlled.A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into trial group and control group with 30 patients for each.All patients recieved same basic treatment;but the traditional chinese herbs were only added to the trial group.The herbs were boiled in water,once a day.The change of the symptom of asthma and the reduction of the Wheezing sound after 15 days treatment were evaluated.Results The total effective rate of the abatement of the asthma and Wheezing sound in the control group and trial group was 93.33%(28/30)and 73.72(22/30),both of the cure rates compared with the total effective rates were statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion Traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of bronchial asthma clinical efficacy significantly better than Western medicine treatment of bronchial asthma with clinical efficacy.
分 类 号:R256.2[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28