两种不同径路茎突截短术治疗茎突综合征的临床疗效比较  

作　　者：徐小鸿 

机构地区：[1]自贡市第一人民医院,四川自贡643000

出　　处：《中外医疗》2011年第19期26-26,共1页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的探讨不同路径茎突截短术治疗茎突综合症的临床疗效。方法选取我院2006年7月至2009年8月收治的220例茎突综合症患者的临床资料,随机分为治疗组(200例)和对照组(20例),治疗组患者行经颈外径路茎突截短术,对照组患者行经口内径路茎突截短术,比较两组患者的临床疗效。比较两组患者的术后并发症。结果对照组患者术后并发症发生率明显高于治疗组,两组患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经颈外径路茎突截短术治疗茎突综合症,避免大神经和血管的损伤,降低术后并发挥的发生,疗效满意值得在临床推广。Objective To investigate the path truncated styloid process styloid process syndrome in the treatment of clinical efficacy.Methods 220 patients in our hospital clinical data of patients with elongated styloid process syndrome were randomly divided into treatment group（200 cases） and control group（20 cases） were compared the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications.Results The complication rate in patients was significantly higher than the treatment group,two groups were statistically significant differences（P0.05）.Conclusion The external approach cervical shortening treatment of the styloid process styloid process syndrome in the clinical efficacy of satisfaction is worth.

关 键 词：茎突综合症 颈外径路茎突截短 口内径路茎突截短 并发症 

分 类 号：R7[医药卫生—临床医学]