城邦:无国家的社会——关于希腊城邦国家资格的争论  

Greek Polis:Stateless Societies? A Debate about the Statehood of Ancient Greek Poleis

作　　者：石庆波[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学历史学院,博士研究生北京100089

出　　处：《世界历史》2011年第4期89-95,160,共7页World History

摘　　要：贝兰特认为,古希腊城邦缺乏"传统"国家定义所说的对内强制力量、明确分化的阶级和政府机构,因而不具备国家资格,而是人类学所说的"无国家的社会"。汉森、格里宁以及范德弗利特等学者针锋相对,认为希腊的城邦机构复杂有序,司法机制和公民参与较为突出,是民主制的早期国家或公民国家。这场关于希腊城邦国家资格的争论,实际上折射了古典史学界以及人类学界在理论和方法上的某些分歧。According to Moshe Berent,because of lack of public coercive apparatus,the differentiation of classes and government,which were considered essential in traditional state theory,most ancient Greek poleis were stateless societies rather than states.His argument was criticized by M.H.Hansen,Leonid E.Grinin and E.C.L.van der Vliet.They all suggested that most poleis were early democratic states or citizens-states,because the institutions of polis were sophisticated and efficient,the judicial systems and the participation of citizens were more prominent.This debate about statehood reflects some diverges of theory and research method in classical history and anthropology respectively.

关 键 词：无国家的社会 国家资格 早期国家 城邦 

分 类 号：K125[历史地理—历史学]