检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范治璐[1] 鞠红卫[1] 李传刚[1] 姜旭东[1] 刘志宇[1] 蒋思雄[1] 于洋[1] 范维伟[1] 尚耀华[1]
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学附属第二医院泌尿外科,116003
出 处:《中华泌尿外科杂志》2011年第8期532-534,共3页Chinese Journal of Urology
摘 要:目的探讨索利那新加坦索罗辛治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的疗效。方法OAB患者53例,男15例,女38例。年龄29~72岁,平均43岁。随机分为2组,A组为单用索利那新组(27例),B组为索利那新加用坦索罗辛组(26例)。服药方法:索利那新5mg/d,坦索罗辛0.2mg/a。连续14d后随访,再进行OABSS评分。结果A组患者治疗前后尿急评分分别为(3.3±1.0)与(1.9±0.6)分,OABSS评分分别为(10.8±4.9)与(5.2±1.8)分;B组患者治疗前后尿急评分分别为(3.6±1.0)与(0.9±0.1)分,OABSS评分分别为(10.7±1.9)与(3.9±1.8)分,2组治疗前后差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),2组治疗后尿急评分和OABSS评分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论索利那新加用坦索罗辛可以有效缓解OAB患者的尿急症状并降低OABSS评分,索利那新加用坦索罗辛疗效好于单用索利那新。Objective To evaluate the efficacy of sollfenacin with or without tamsulosin in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Methods Fifty-three patients with OAB were randomly divided into two groups (group A 27 patients, group B 26 patients). The patients received either solifenacin 5 rag/day in group A or combined with Tamsulosin 0.2 rag/day in group B for two weeks. During the treatent period all the patients recorded voiding and adverse events in a diary. The symptoms of urgency, frequency, inconti- nence were evaluated by OABSS scores at the begining and end of the therapy period. The results of the efficacy and safety were analyzed by using SPSS 13.0. Results The OABSS scores at the begining and end for the two groups were significantly different (P 〈 0.01 ). In both groups the efficacy was obvious. The OABSS scores at the end of the therapy between group A and B were significantly different (P 〈 0.05). The efficacy of group B was better than that of group A. Conclusion The efficacy of solifenacin combined with tamsulosin was better than solifenaein alone in OAB.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.93.1