出 处:《中华麻醉学杂志》2011年第6期677-679,共3页Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
摘 要:目的评价不同剂量右美托咪啶对七氟醚抑制50%下腹部手术患者切皮诱发应激反应的最低肺泡气有效浓度(MACBAR)的影响。方法择期全麻下拟行下腹部手术患者60例,年龄25~55岁,体重45~75kg,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法,将患者随机分为对照组(Dn组,n=15)和不同剂量右美托咪啶组(D1~3,组,n=15)。D0组不使用右美托咪啶,D0组经10min静脉注射右美托咪啶0.1μg/kg负荷剂量后,分别以0.4、0.8、1.2μg·kg^-1·h^-1的速率静脉输注30min后进行麻醉诱导。D0-3,组第1例患者呼气末七氟醚浓度分别为3.0%、2.5%、2.0%、1.5%,以切皮时患者MAP或HR较基础值上升〈15%为抑制交感肾上腺反应有效,若抑制交感肾上腺反应有效则下一例呼气末七氟醚浓度降低一级,若无效则升高一级,相邻浓度比为0.9。计算七氟醚MACBAR及其95%可信区间(95%CI)。结果D0.3组七氟醚MACBAR及其95%CI分别为:2.85%(2.4.4%~3.32%)、1.91%(1.61%-2.26%)、1.52%(1.31%-1.77%)、1.34%(1.15%-1.57%)。与风组比较,D1-3组七氟醚MACBAR均降低(P〈0.05);与D1组比较,D2组和D3组七氟醚MACBAR降低(P〈0.05);D2组和D3组七氟醚MACBAR比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论右美托咪啶0.4、0.8和1.2μg·kg^-1·h^-1连续输注30min可降低七氟醚MACBAR,增强七氟醚抑制应激反应的效应,且呈剂量依赖性。Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for blunting responses to skin incision ( MACRAR ) in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 25-55 yr, weighing 45-75 kg, undergoing elec- tive lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n = 15 each) : control group (Do group) and 3 dexmedetomidine groups (D1, 1)2 and D3 groups). The patients were unpremedicated. Dexmedetomidine was not used in group DO . A loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.1 μg/kg was injected iv over 10 min, and then dexmedetomidine was infused at a rate of 0.4, 0. 8 and 1.2 μg·kg^-1·h^-1for 30 rain in groups Di.3 respectively. Anesthesia was induced with inhalation of 8 % sevoflurane. Laryngeal mask airway was inserted when BIS value decreased to 45-55. The patients were mechanically ventilated with inhalation of sevoflurane and a mixture of 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen, and the fresh gas flow was set at 1 L/min. In D0-3 groups, the initial end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane were 3.0% , 2.5%, 2.0% and 1.5% respectively. The patients' response to skin incision was described as effective if MR or MAP increased by 〈 15 %, or ineffective (MR or MAP increased by ≥ 15% ) . When the response was effective, the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was decreased in the next patient, when ineffective, increased, and the ratio between the two successive concentrations was 0.9.The MRCBAR of sevoflurane was determined by up-and-down method, and 95 % confidence interval was calculated. Results The MRCBAs (95% confidence interval) of sevoflurane was 2.85% (2.44%-3.32%), 1.91% (1.61%-2.26%), 1.52% (1.31%-1.77%), and 1.34% (1.15%-1.57%)in D0-3 groups respectively. The MRCBAR of sevoflurane was signitlcanfly lower in D1-3 groups than in Do group, and in D2 and D3 groups than in group Di (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...