检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国奥委会反兴奋剂委员会检查处,北京100029 [2]北京体育大学康复中心,北京100084
出 处:《北京体育大学学报》1999年第4期6-8,44,共4页Journal of Beijing Sport University
摘 要:赛内检查和赛外检查是兴奋剂检查的两种方式,是打击使用兴奋剂行为的两个有效的手段。通过比较二者的概念、实施方法、操作程序等内容,可以清楚的看到二者各自的优缺点。通过对1993~1997 年赛内、外检查结果的比较分析,可以看出这几年国家体育总局在逐步加大兴奋剂检查的力度的同时,逐渐注重赛外检查。但如何调整赛内检查和赛外检查的分布、结构,使之更科学、以及怎样使赛外检查得更有效,并进一步提高兴奋剂检查的质量,将是今后工作。In competition tests and out of competition tests are the two ways of doping control. They are effective measures for cracking down doping behaviors. By comparing their concepts, their implementation and operation procedures the advantages and disadvantages of the two ways of doping test can be seen clearly. The results of the in competition tests and out of competition tests from 1993 to 1997 were compared and analyzed. It was shown that in the past 5 years at the same time with the progressive strengthening of doping control the State Sport General Administration of China attached more and more importance to out of competition tests. However, to adjust the distribution and structure of the two ways so as to make them more scientific, to make the out of competition tests more effective and to further improve the quality and quantity of doping control will still be emphasized in future researches.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229