人肉搜索、王菲案与隐私权保护的实证分析  

Empirical Analyses of Human-powered Search,Faye Wong Case and Privacy Protection

作　　者：石毕凡[1] 徐珉川[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,副教授硕士生导师杭州310008 [2]清华大学法学院,法理学博士研究生北京100084

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2011年第8期34-39,156,共6页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江省社科联重点课题"网络空间表达自由的管制及其界限"(08Z02);国家"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目"转型期法治的理论;制度与实证研究"的资助

摘　　要："人肉搜索"虽在一定程度上发挥了舆论监督功能,但不可避免伴随着诸多负面影响。"王菲案"作为人肉搜索隐私侵权的典型案例,其核心是如何确定隐私权及对应义务的内容与界限。权利的维护需要成本,当权利的实现成本低于其收益时,权利人才有足够的内驱力去维权。侵权责任法通过降低维权成本激励被侵权人维护自身的权利,通过增大侵权成本阻止潜在的侵权冲动。基于成本与收益的考量和各方利益之平衡,网络侵权法律救济体现了"防君子易、防小人难"的旨趣。Human-powered Search' to some extent plays an important role in public supervision,but it inevitably brings a lot of negative effects.The core of Faye Wong case,a typical case of privacy violation by human-powered search,is about how to cognize the privacy infringement and the contents and limits of its corresponding obligation.Right protection needs cost,so when the attainable cost of right is lower than its profit,the obligee would have enough drive to protect his right.The Tort Law through decreasing the right protection cost encourages the infringed to protect their right and through increasing infringement cost stops potential infringement impulse.Based on the consideration of cost and profit and the balance of the interests of all parties,legal remedy for cyber infringements reflects an interesting theme that 'it is easy to guard against gentlemen but difficult against villains

关 键 词：人肉搜索 隐私权 权利界限 经济分析 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]