检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]佛山市第一人民医院妇产科,广东佛山528000
出 处:《保健医学研究与实践》2011年第3期49-50,共2页Health Medicine Research and Practice
摘 要:目的评价在盆底肌肉康复中使用医用石蜡油替代专用润滑导电膏可行性。方法 2009年12月-2010年8月在我院行盆底肌肉康复术疗程10~15次的患者分两组,一组行电刺激时选择石蜡油,另一组使用润滑导电膏,记录盆底肌肉有效收缩时的电流强度。结果石蜡油组平均电流强度为(48.0±8.1)mA,导电膏组平均电流强度为(48.4±8.4)mA,2组所需电流强度无差异(P>0.05)。结论在盆底肌肉康复术中选择石蜡油替代导电膏作润滑剂时,不增加电流强度,不影响治疗效果,为导电膏过敏患者的一种替代方法。Objective To evaluate the feasibility of replacing the special lubrication conductive paste by medical paraffin oil in pelvic floor muscles rehabilitation.Method To choose the patients who received treatment for 10 to 15 times in the course of pelvic floor muscles rehabilitation from December in 2009 to August in 2010,and they were divided into two groups.When using the electric stimulation,one of the groups chose the paraffin oil and the other group lubrication conductive paste,and the current intensity when there were effective contractions of pelvic floor muscles was written down.Results The average current intensity of the group used paraffin oil was(48.0±8.1)mA,and the group used conductive paste(48.4±8.4)mA.There was no difference(P〈0.05) between the current intensity of the two groups.Conclusion When choosing paraffin oil to replace conductive paste in pelvic floor muscles rehabilitation,it increases no current intensity,and it has no effect on the efficacy.It is an alternative method for the patients with conductive paste allergy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15