对刑事责任理论的质疑  

Questioning the Theory of Criminal Obligation

作　　者：侯国云[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》2011年第4期75-80,共6页Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University

摘　　要：刑事责任至今仍然是一个不成熟的理论。关于刑事责任的定义,尽管有多种不同的学说,但没有一种是科学的、不受批评的。而最为流行的"否定性评价和谴责说"却又是矛盾最多、最不科学的学说。此外,关于刑事责任的地位、根据、发展阶段以及刑事责任的实现等理论,都存在着难以克服的矛盾。事实上,"刑事责任"就是"刑罚处罚"的意思,并不是罪与刑的桥梁和中介,它在刑法典中只是"刑罚处罚"的一个代名词而已,没有必要把"刑事责任"搞得过于复杂。Criminal obligation is still not a mature theory. Even though there are various definitions for it, no one is scientific and accepted without criticism. However, the most popular one ＂theory of negative evaluation and condemn＂ is also the one that is the most contradictory and non-scientific one. Moreover, there exist irremediable paradoxes in its status, motivation, developing stages, and realization. As a matter of fact, criminal obligation is criminal punishment, but not the bridge between crime and penality. It is just a pronoun for criminal punishment in criminal law. Therefore, there is no need to complex the term of criminal obligation.

关 键 词：刑事责任 刑事处罚 批评异议 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]