检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林敏[1] 谢家泰[1] 吴丽霞[1] 李梅岚[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属三明第一医院综合内科,福建三明365000
出 处:《医学信息(中旬刊)》2011年第8期3928-3929,共2页Medical Information Operations Sciences Fascicule
摘 要:目的:评价呼气末正压通气(PEEP)治疗不同病因导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的价值。方法:45例ARDS患者,分为原发性肺损伤组20例和继发性肺损伤组25例。比较两组间的APACHEⅡ分值,PEEP治疗前后动脉血PH值、氧合指数(Pa02/Fi02)、呼吸频率(RR)。结果:两组治疗前与治疗2小时后的Pa02/Fi02、呼吸频率均有显着差异,两组间的APACHEⅡ分值无显着差异。结论:呼气末正压通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征安全、有效。Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of positive end expiratory pressure(PEEP) in trcating acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) caused by various factors.Methods:The total of 45 patients were divided in two groups:primary long injury group(20 cases) and secondary lung injury group(25 cases).The APACHEⅡ score between two groups,artery blood PⅡ,oxygenation index(Pa02/Fi02),repiratory rate before and after PEEP in the two grous were compared.Results:There were sig-nificantly diffcrcnccs in Pa02/Fi02,repiratory rate before and after 2h of PEEP in the two groups,and no significantly difference in APACHEⅡ seores was observed between two groups.Conelusion:PEEP is a safe and effective method in the treatment of ARDS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112