检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张怀雁[1] 孙劼[1] 肖敏智[1] 邓春红[1] 李云[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省中山市人民医院内科ICU,中山528403
出 处:《当代护士(下旬刊)》2011年第6期138-140,共3页Modern Nurse
摘 要:目的探索一种穿刺成功率更高、安全且并发症较少的动脉穿刺置管的路径。方法对ICU收治的617例患者随机分为采取桡动脉或股动脉穿刺置管组,对2组病例进行分析,并对临床效果进行评价。结果 2组穿刺采血方法成功率、血管并发症、患者舒适状况差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论桡动脉穿刺置管成功率较高,血管并发症少,同时可以减轻患者痛苦,值得在临床工作中推广。Objective:To Explore a path of the arterial catheterization with the higher rate of puncture success,more safety and less complications.Methods:617 cases in ICU were randomly divided into radial approach group(n=301) and femoral approach group(n=306) we compared with the application effect of two groups.Result:The rate of puncture success,vascular complications and the comfortable condition of patients were significant different in two groups(P0.01).Conclusion:Compared to the femoral approach group,the radial approach group has the higher rate of puncture success,less complications.The radial arterial catheterization can relieve the pain of patients and is worth to extend in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.251.231