检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟性友[1] 董亚斌[1] 陶学勇[1] 侯保霞[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉科,开封475001
出 处:《医学研究杂志》2011年第8期141-143,共3页Journal of Medical Research
摘 要:目的观察支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削器切削声带良性肿物的疗效。方法选择108例临床可确诊为声带良性肿物患者,随机分为支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削器切除声带良性肿物(观察组56例)与支撑喉联合镜鼻内镜下显微喉器械切除声带良性肿物(对照组52例),术后随访并观察6个月评定比较两组疗效。结果两组治愈率分别为92.86%和50%,有效率分别为98.21%和92.31%,临床治愈率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两种术式疗效前者较好,且手术容易操作、时间短。Objective To observe the effect of micro - electric devices in cutting vocal cord benign masses under laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope. Methods 108 cases of vocal cord benign masses clinically diagnosed patients were randomly divided into laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope with micro - electric devices cutting vocal cord benign masses ( study group, n = 56) and the laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope with micro forceps cutting vocal cord benign masses (control group,n = 52). Patients were followed up and assessed for 6 months after treatment. Results The cure rates were 92.86% and 50% ,and effective rate was 98.21% and 92.31%. The clinical cure rate had significant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The effect of the former is better than the latter, and the former is more easily operate and has shorter time.
分 类 号:R767.4[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117