检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琦[1] 陈兴龙[1] 余嵘华[2] 徐明明[1] 杨阳[1] 吴边[1] 倪志波[1] 董凤忠[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所,安徽合肥230031 [2]合肥工业大学应用物理系,安徽合肥230009
出 处:《光谱学与光谱分析》2011年第9期2546-2551,共6页Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(11075184)资助
摘 要:采用激光诱导击穿光谱分析技术对钢样中锰、铬两种微量元素的含量进行了测量。实验研究发现,最优取样的延迟时间为2.0μs,最佳激光光束聚焦位置和光谱收集探头分别位于样品表面以下3.5 mm和表面以上1.5 mm处。以MnⅠ:403.07 nm和CrⅠ:427.48 nm作为分析线,分别采用传统定量分析和内定标的方法对钢样中的Mn和Cr进行了定量分析。通过对比发现,采用内定标方法得到的拟合曲线的相关指数R2分别为0.998和0.979,均高于传统定标方法拟合曲线的相应相关指数。利用内定标建立起来的定标曲线,计算得到Mn和Cr的检测限分别是0.005%和0.0406%。Quantitative analysis of trace elements such as manganese and chromium in steel was performed employing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique in the present paper. The experimental measurements indicate that the optimal delay, focal plane and detecting position from the sample surface are 2 μs, --3. 5 mm and 1.5 mm,respectively. Mn I:403.07 nm and Cr I : 427.48 nm were selected as the analytical lines and their contents in the target steel sample were analyzed with traditional quantitative analysis and internal standard methods. Comparison of the results with two kinds of quantitatively analytical methods show that the coefficients of determination gained by internal standard method are 0. 998 and 0, 979 which are much better than the results obtained by traditional quantitative analysis method. According to the established calibration curve by internal standard method the detection limits of manganese and chromium calculated are 0. 005% and 0. 040 6%, respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145