中文版护生临床学习效能条件量表的信效度研究  

Research in reliability and validity of the Chinese version of conditions of learning effectivenessquestionnaire

作　　者：刘彦慧[1] 曹晓媛[1] 王珊珊[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津中医药大学护理学院,300193

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2011年第22期73-75,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：：天津市卫生局专项基金项目（2005080）

摘　　要：目的译制中文版护生临床学习效能条件量表（conditions of learning effectiveness questionnaire，CLEQ），并对其信度和效度进行初步评价。方法翻译并修订中文版CtZQ，并采用此量表对176名护理本科实习生进行调查，对测定结果进行信度和效度分析。结果中文版CLEQ的Cronbach’s α系数为0．956，4个维度Cronbach’s α仪均〉0．70，表明该量表具有较好的内部一致性。总问卷分半信度为0．926，重测信度为0．869。4个维度的CVI为0．91-1．00，全部条目平均CVI为0．94。各维度及各维度与总量表之间高度相关，相关系数在0．691-0．829。探索性因子分析得到4个公共因子，共解释了61．63％的累计方差贡献率。结论中文版CLEQ信度、效度较好，可用于评价我国护生临床学习环境的状况。Objective To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Conditions of Learning Effectiveness Questionnaire （CLEQ）. Methods To translate and revise the Chinese version of CLEQ. A total of 176 baccalaureate nursing students were surveyed by the Chinese version of CLEQ and the results about the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CLEQ were assessed. Results Cronbach＇s α of the total Chinese version of CLEQ was 0.956. Cronbach＇s α of four subscales were all over 0.70. The internal consistency was good. The reliability of Split half was 0.926 and retest reliability was 0.869. CVI of the four subscales were 0.91-1.00. The average CVI of the scale was 0.94. There were significant relationships among subscales. The correlation coefficient was 0.691-0.829. Four common factors were found through factor analysis, which explained the percent of 61.63% rotation sums of squared loadings. Conclusions The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CLEQ were good, so it could be used to evaluate the level of clinical learning environment among nursing students.

关 键 词：学生 护理 临床实习 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R47-4[医药卫生—护理学]