检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《管理学刊》2011年第4期66-69,108,共4页Journal of Management
摘 要:公共服务与经济增长之间的关系一直是国内外理论界研究的重点,已有的理论研究主要侧重于公共支出规模和结构对于经济增长速度所造成的影响,但是关于公共支出的结果(即公共服务)是否实现了均等化,以及基本公共服务均等化与经济增长的关系,却鲜有学者深入探讨。笔者认为,目前我国公共服务非均等化的现状已经对经济增长造成了较大负面影响,这种影响既表现为整体层面的不良影响,也体现为地区以及部门之间的差异。公共服务配置的不均等严重抑制了我国经济发展水平的提高。因此,无论从保证社会公正公平的角度来看,还是从提高经济效益的角度来看,促进基本公共服务均等化都是当前的理性选择。The relationship between equalization of basic public service and economic growth has long been a hot topic in academic circle both at home and abroad,the pre-existing theoretical research mainly focuses on the impact of scale and structure of public expenditure on the increase speed of economy,but few people have made a further study into whether public expenditure(public service) is always an equal sharing,and the relationship between equalization of basic public service and economic growth.The author thinks that non-equalization of basic public service has made a great adverse impact on economic growth in China.This impact not only reflects overall,but also represents diversity among different regions.Non-equalization of distribution of public service strangles the economy,at present time so as to guarantee social justice,and to improve economic efficiency,promoting equalization of basic public service is the ideal and only work we are to do.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40