检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董德信[1] 李瑞杰[2] 陈波[1] 张文虎[2] 潘锡山[2]
机构地区:[1]广西科学院,广西南宁530007 [2]河海大学海岸灾害及防护教育部重点实验室,江苏南京210098
出 处:《水利水电科技进展》2011年第4期65-68,共4页Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金(40766001);广西科学院基金科研业务费项目(11YJ24HY01)
摘 要:从2种悬沙垂向分布公式出发,结合对数流速分布公式,导出2种常见垂向平均含沙量计算方法的比值关系表达式。讨论了2种方法的区别与联系:两者不一定相等,比值可以大于1,也可以小于1,当近底相对水深稍大(如大于0.01)时加权平均含沙量小于算术平均含沙量,与实际相符;2种垂向平均含沙量的差异主要由悬沙及流速垂向分布不均匀性引起。对2种方法的实际应用情况进行了初步分析。Based on the two formulae for the vertical distribution of suspended sediment and the logarithmic formula for the velocity distribution,the ratio expressions for two common methods to calculate the vertical average sediment concentration were derived.The differences and relations between the two methods were discussed: they were not necessarily equal,and the ratio might be larger or smaller than 1.When the relative depth of near bed was slightly larger(e.g.,larger than 0.01),the weighted average sediment concentration was less than the arithmetic average sediment concentration,which agreed with the actual situation.The differences between the two vertical average sediment concentrations were mainly caused by the uneven vertical distribution of velocity and suspended sediment.Applications of the two methods were preliminarily analyzed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222