检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军电子工程学院医院,安徽合肥230037
出 处:《中外医学研究》2011年第24期174-175,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的比较三种方法治疗鸡眼的临床疗效。方法 106例鸡眼患者,分别采用药物贴敷法、手术切除法和小针刀疗法,观察疗效。结果药物贴敷法、手术切除法、小针刀疗法的治愈率分别是72.2%、84.4%、94.7%,总有效率分别是83.3%、96.9%、100%。结论三种治疗鸡眼的方法均有一定的临床疗效,尤其以小针刀疗法更为确切,值得推广。Objective To compare clinical efficacy of three kinds of methods for the treatment of corns. Methods Corns were 106 cases, respectively, patching method using drugs, surgical removal of method, and small needle- knife therapy effects were observed. Results Drug patching method, surgical excision, small needle -knife therapy cure rates were 72.2%, 84. 4%, 94. 7%, the total effective rates were 83.3%, 96.9% and 100%. Conclusion Three kinds of methods for the treatment of corns have some clinical efficacy, particularly in small needle -knife therapy more orecise, it is worth promoting.
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R758.15[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249