精神鉴定的可反驳性——对《刑法》第18条第1款的防卫  

Rebuttable Nature of Mental Identification——Defense of Item 1,Article 18 of Penal Code

作　　者：吴世相[1] 赵玮[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期39-44,共6页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《刑法》第18条第1款赋予完全精神障碍者刑事豁免权,然而,作为其载体的精神鉴定本身饱含不安定性而留有重大缺陷。一种有残缺的实体依据不应成为封闭性条款的铁律,而必须具有抽象理念意义上的可反驳性。作为对精神鉴定的防卫,主张削弱精神鉴定的实体法上的效果,将《刑法》第18条第1款由豁免型条款修正为可以型的减免条款,打破封闭性,以减少缺陷的放大所带来的波动效应,从而建构可反驳空间。Item 1, Article 18 of Penal Code gives the full mentally ill immunity from prosecution. However, it is a great shame that the mental identification, as a carrier, is full of insecurities. A kind of physical defect should not be closed according to the terms of the iron law and must have a rebuttable nature on an abstract level. As a defense against the mental identification, claiming for weakening the effect of the mental identification on the substantive law, Item 1, Article 18 of Penal Code modifies the type of exemption of relieving the article to break the seal so as to reduce the effect of fluctuations by enlarging of the defect, finally constructs the rebuttable space.

关 键 词：精神鉴定 豁免条款 可反驳性 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]