日本声称拥有钓鱼岛领土权的论据辨析  

Analysis on Japan's Basis of Argument for Alleging Its Territoriality over Diaoyu Islands

作　　者：郑海麟[1] 

机构地区：[1]香港中文大学亚太研究所

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2011年第7期93-104,共12页Pacific Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:"社会权的可诉性及其程度研究"(07CFX010)的阶段性研究成果;中国太平洋学会基金项目:"东;南中国海争议岛屿史地考证"(2200214)研究成果

摘　　要：自从上世纪70年代初中日钓鱼岛之争事起以来,日本声称拥有钓鱼岛主权的论据,大都出自1970年9月17日以琉球政府官方名义发表的"关于尖阁列岛的领土权"声明。之后,日本外务省根据该"声明"的精神,于1972年3月8日发表"尖阁列岛分明是日本领土"的官方见解,坚称钓鱼岛归属日本。"声明"和"见解"出笼后,成为日本历次官方发言人用来与中国交涉钓鱼岛主权的持论依据。尽管日方在申述自己的主张时提出许多理由和证据,但大致可归结为两点:一是经纬线划界法;二是无主地先占法。因此,本文在弄清日方所谓主张和论据的同时,对其"经纬线划界法"和"无主地先占法"的辩词,一并加以驳斥。Since disputes on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan arose in the early 1970s, most of Japan＇ s basis of argument for alleging its territoriality over Diaoyu Islands have been extracted from Declaration on Territoriality over Diaoyu Islands officially issued by Government of the Ryukyu Islands on Sept. 17, 1970. Afterwards, according to the gist of this Declaration, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan published an official understanding alleging Diaoyu Islands are clearly Japanese Territory firmly alleging that Diaoyu Islands belong to Japan. The Declaration and Understanding upon being published have become basis of argument for all previous Japanese official spokesman to discuss sovereignty over Diaoyu Islands with China. Therefore, if we want to un- derstand disputes over Diaoyu Islands between Japan and China, we must for one thing make clear Japanese allegation and basis of argument. Therefore, although Japan has proposed many justifications and evidences when stating its allegation, the main basis of argument can be summarized as two points： one is Delimitation according to longitude and latitude, and the other is the Preemption. This paper thinks it＇ s a prerequisite to make out Japan＇ s proposals and basis of argument for all his allegings, then we have to refute delimitation according to longititude and latitude and the alleged preemption.

关 键 词：钓鱼岛 经纬度 无主地 领有权 历史事实与国际法 

分 类 号：D823[政治法律—政治学]