趋势和走向:中国史学批评研究30年  

Trend and Direction:30 Years' Study of Chinese Historiographic Criticism BAI Yun

作　　者：白云[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学历史与行政学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期34-42,共9页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2011年度国家社科基金西部项目"中国史学批评的传统与转型"(11XZS002)成果

摘　　要：中国史学批评研究已经走过了30年。30年来,学者们在中国史学批评的贯通研究、专题研究、个案研究等方面均取得了一定的成绩,有些相关问题已有比较深入的探讨。但总体上看,贯通研究相对薄弱,专题研究众说不一,个案研究发展不平衡,中国史学批评学科的建设还任重道远。今后宜重视贯通研究和理论探索,加强研究中的基础性工作建设,深化专题史学批评研究,重视断代史学批评研究,拓展史学批评个案研究,关注史学批评学科建设研究。果能如此,则中国史学批评学科的建设与繁荣,或指日可待矣。Study on Chinese historiographic criticism has gone through three decades,during which scholars have made some achievements about the study of Chinese Historiographic criticism in areas such as comprehensive study,monographic study,case study,etc.Some related problems have been through relatively in-depth discussion.But generally speaking,comprehensive study is relatively weak;views on monographic study vary;case study has an unbalanced development,so it a long way to build the discipline of Chinese historiographic criticism.In the future,it is necessary to stress comprehensive study and theoretical exploration,to strengthen basic research work,and to deepen the study of monographic study.Importance will be attached to the study of dynastic historiographic criticism.Case study will be expanded and disciplinary construction of historiographic criticism will be focused.If so,disciplinary construction and prosperity of the Chinese historiographic criticism will perhaps be expected soon.

关 键 词：中国史学批评 研究现状 趋势 走向 

分 类 号：K09[历史地理—历史学]