包容性生态民主理论的新进展(下)  

Recent Theoretical Developments on the Inclusive Ecological Democracy Project(Part 2)

作　　者：塔基斯.福托鲍洛斯 丁晔[2] 

机构地区：[1]<包容性民主国际学报> [2]北京大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2011年第4期115-128,共14页Journal of Poyang Lake

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"西方绿色左翼政治思潮研究"阶段性成果(09YJA710046)

摘　　要：从主题上探讨包容性生态民主理论在过去1997-2007年间的新进展可以分为三个部分:第一部分探讨与包容性民主相关的理论问题;第二部分论述由包容性民主计划所阐发的全球化理论,以及它与左翼的非系统的全球化阐释方法的不同;第三部分在说明旧的反体系运动和新社会运动为什么日趋衰退或被吸纳进既存体系的同时,阐明包容性民主计划如何区别于其他激进的政治方案。包容性民主计划所设想的新型反体系运动,无论在总体目标还是具体手段上都与传统的反体系运动有着根本性的差别,而它转型战略的基本原则是:既然系统性的变革目标要求实现在制度和文化层面上与过去的断裂,就必须创建新的政治组织和致力于体系变革的新的全面的政治纲领,并同时在大规模民众层面上造就清晰的反体系意识。The aim of this article is to present briefly the new theoretical developments on the ID project since ten years ago. The first part investigates the theoretical issues in TID. The second part presents the theory on globalization developed by the ID project and delineates it from the usual non-systemic globalization approaches of the Left. Finally, the third part attempts, on the one hand, to show why according to the ID approach both the old antisystemic movements（Marxism, anarchism） as well as the ‘new’ social movements（Green,feminism,etc.） are either in a stage of decline or simply have been integrated into the System and, on the other,to briefly delineate ID from other radical projects. The rationale behind the ID transitional strategy is that, as systemic change requires a rupture with the past which extends to both the institutional and the cultural level, such a rupture is only possible through the development of a new political organisation and a new comprehensive political program for systemic change that will create a clear anti-systemic consciousness at a massive scale.

关 键 词：包容性民主 现代性 全球化 反体系运动 绿色左翼 

分 类 号：D082[政治法律—政治学]