检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡宜奎[1]
出 处:《南京财经大学学报》2011年第3期86-91,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
基 金:江苏省教育厅哲社课题"和谐社会与群体性纠纷解决机制研究"(项目编号:07SJD820006)的成果之一
摘 要:公司可以参加股东代表诉讼的正当性在于其符合正当程序原理及诉讼的效率价值,也是股东代表诉讼诉权的性质所决定的。允许公司选择是否参加诉讼是其诉讼选择权在股东代表诉讼中的具体落实,符合该制度设立的初衷。基于股东代表诉讼的特殊制度设计以及该制度在我国发展的现状,公司只应参加原告股东一方进行诉讼,而不宜允许其辅助被告。Corporation's litigation participation of shareholder's derivative action is founded on that it's coincident with theory of due procedure and the efficiency merit of litigation. Furthermore, it's also determined by the quality of shareholder's derivative of litigation right. Permitting corporation to choose whether participate in the shareholder's derivative action or not is not only the reflection of corporation's choosing right of procedure hut also accorded with the original intention of shareholder's derivative action system. Based on the peculiar system design of shareholder's derivative action and the system's evolution status quo in our country, corporation should he only permitted to assist the plaintiff shareholder, excluding the defendant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15