检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽大学生命科学学院,合肥230039 [2]淮南师范学院生命科学系,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《生物学杂志》2011年第4期38-42,共5页Journal of Biology
基 金:2010年度安徽高等学校省级自然科学研究项目;淮南八公山区大型土壤动物群落结构研究(编号:KJ2010B447)
摘 要:2010年3月—4月对淮南市八公山区4种生境土壤动物进行了调查,获得各类土壤动物1965只,隶属4门12纲27目。其中优势类群为膜翅目和近孔寡毛目,常见类群为等足目、鞘翅目幼虫、鞘翅目成虫、柄眼目、鳞翅目幼虫、蜘蛛目和山蛩目,其余类群为稀有类群。研究结果表明:植被类型对土壤动物群落的结构特征有一定影响,不同植被条件下土壤动物个体及群落类群数存在差异。土壤动物多样性与均匀度指数呈正相关,与优势度呈负相关。4种生境的土壤动物群落之间都达到了中等相似水平。从土壤动物群落数量的垂直分布来看,0 cm^5 cm土壤层数量最大,有明显的表聚现象。From March to April 2010,soil animal communities from 4 nature environments in Bagongshan mountain of Huainan were investigated.A total of 1965 soft animals were collected.They are belong to 27 orders,12 class and 4 phyla.The dominant genera were Hymenoptera and Oligochaeta,while Isopoda,Coleoptem larva,Coleoptem larva,Stylommatophora,Coleoptem larva,Araneae and Spirobolida were the ordinary groups and others were rear groups.The results suggested that the types of vegetation affected the community structure of soil animals,the individual number and group number of soil animal communities were different.The diversity and uniformity index of soil animals were positively correlated,but the diversity and the dominance were negatively correlated.The similarity index of soil animals among these 4 habitats was moderate in all communities.From the vertical distribution of soil animals in soil profile,the highest was in the 0-5 soil layer.The soil animals showed obvious surface assembly phenomenon.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171