检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋丽艳[1]
机构地区:[1]太仓市第一人民医院神经科,江苏太仓215400
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2011年第05Z期61-63,共3页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的评价阿米三嗪-萝巴新治疗认知障碍的疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Cochrane图书馆(2009年第2期),Medline(1966年至2009年),Embase(1974年至2009年)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM,1978年至2009年),收集所有阿米三嗪-萝巴新与安慰剂或其他药物治疗的随机对照试验,由2名研究者独立提取资料与评价质量,用RevMan软件统计分析。结果共纳入5个研究,491例患者,Meta分析显示阿米三嗪-萝巴新在总体疗效、HDS评分、MMSE评分、FAQ评分对照组比较无统计学差异,但与治疗前HDS评分、MMSE评分、FAQ评分比较均有明显改善。所有研究均未发现严重的不良反应。结论现有的临床证据来看,阿米三嗪-萝巴新治疗治疗认知障碍有效且安全性较高。但尚需更多高质量研究以增加证据的强度。Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of amitrine bismesylate for cognitive impairment.Methods Random-- ized controlled trials(RCT) were identified from the Cochrane Library(issue 2,2009),Medline(1966-2009),Embase(1974-2009) and CBM(1978-2009).RCT comparing amitrine bismesytate with ptacebe or other drug treatment were included.Two reviewers independently assessed trials quality and extracted date.The RevMan software was used for statistical analysis. Results Fifth studies involving 491 patients were included.Meta--analysis indicated that changes of total effective rate, HDS,MMSE,FAQ had no statistically significant differences between the two groups,with very significant difference in the amitrine bismesylate groups included HDS,MMSE,FAQ.No serious adverse effects were identified.Conclusion Amitrine bis-- mesylate for cognitive impairment is effective and safe from current clinical evidence.But it still needs more high quality RCT studies in order to increase the strength of the evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112