正骨推拿治疗骶髂关节骨错缝的对比研究  

Comparative Study of Orthopedic Tuina in Treating Staggered Sacroiliac Joints

作　　者：李世刚[1] 程桯 叶光强[1] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学附属南海医院康复医学科,广东佛山528200 [2]广州市康复中心中医科,广东广州510630

出　　处：《辽宁中医药大学学报》2011年第9期109-110,共2页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:研究正骨推拿治疗骶髂关节骨错缝是否有优势。方法:2007年7月—2010年7月南方医科大学附属南海医院康复医学科收治的诊断为骶髂关节损伤的,并排除其他疾病所致的腰腿痛患者126例。按区组随机和单盲法分成:单纯推拿治疗组:38例;推拿加微波治疗组:66例;微波治疗组:22例,以5次为1个疗程,治疗前和治疗1个疗程,疗程结束后用McGi11疼痛评分量表评定其疼痛情况。结果:3组患者治疗前McGill量表评分得分均值比较,P>0.05,统计学上没有显著性差异,3组患者治疗后McGill量表评分得分均值比较,P<0.05,统计学上有显著性差异,推拿加微波组的疗效好于推拿组,推拿组疗效好于微波组。结论:正骨推拿手法治疗骶髂关节错缝的疗效是肯定的具有不可替代的作用。Objective： Does orthopedic tuina have advantages in treating staggered sacroiliac joints？ Methods ： 126 cases of low back pain patients with diagnosis of sacroiliac joint injury and exclusion of other diseases were admitted to the department of rehabilitation medicine from June 2007 to June 2010. The patients were randomized into three groups by block and single-blind methods： massage therapy group with 38 cases, massage and microwave treatment group with 66 cases, microwave treatment group with 22 cases. All patients were given a treatment for five times. The pain level was assessed with McGill pain rating scale before and after treatment. Results ： There is no statistically significant difference of mean score among the three groups before treatment （/：＇〉0.05 ） but statistically significant differences after treatment （ P〈0.05 ）. Massage and microwave group was more effective than massage group, however the latter was better than microwave group. Conclusions ： The efficacy of orthopedic tuina is certainly in treating staggered sacroiliac joints with an irreplaceable role.

关 键 词：推拿 骶髂关节骨错缝 对比研究 

分 类 号：R244.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]