检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《济宁学院学报》2011年第4期77-80,84,共5页Journal of Jining University
摘 要:在司法实践中法院因为被害人与被告人协商达成赔偿协议而对某些被告人予以从轻判处,甚至于在死刑事案件中舆论不时进行声讨的拿钱买命说,这些现象背后是不是能找到合理的理论支撑?在多元纠纷解决的潮流下,司法把刑事案件中被害人亲属与被告人亲属达成的赔偿协议作为量刑情节,在传统对抗模式之外,开辟了一条私力合作之路,这标志着刑事诉讼二元模式即传统"对抗式"司法模式与"合作式"司法模式的确立。As a criminal judge,the author has a puzzle in his judicial practice a: could we find a theory to explain the following phenomena reasonably?-The defendants were given lighter punishment in the condition that the victims and the defendants reached a compensating agreement,even on some capital cases the public media reported as "buying life by money",and so on.The justice takes the compensating agreement,reached by the relatives of the victims and that of the defendants,as the circumstances of sentencing,which opened a way of private cooperation.And this is the mark of the binary pattern of Criminal Action,the "adversary" justice and the "cooperative" justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3