检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓敏[1]
机构地区:[1]河南师范大学政治与管理科学学院,河南新乡453007
出 处:《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第4期131-134,共4页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:作品内在的创造性是著作权法律关系发生的依据和正当性基础。在著作权领域,创造性涵盖在独创性判断之中,但是,由于缺乏独创性的具体标准,作品受保护的范围无法明确界定;功能性作品的出现甚至挑战了作品独创性的底线标准。独创性标准的坚守是著作权立法的目标追求,有利于界定私域与公域的界限;同时,独创性程度、实质性相同的排除、智力投入及创作意图的考量是独创性标准判定的因素。The creativity inside works is the basis and legitimacy for legal relationship of copyright. In fact, creativity is covered in originality judgment from the point of copyright. However, due to lack of specific standard for originality judgment, the protect'ton scope cannot be identified. Moreover, the bottom line of originality is challenged by the advent of functional works. Adhere to originality judgment is the target for copyright legislation, which also helps us better distinguishing between public and private. And there are three main standards for originality judgment which are the level of originality, the discriminating against substantially similar works and the eval'xation of intelligence investment and creation intension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3